A Comparative Study of Fractional CO2 Laser with Topical Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

    Harish Prasanna, Rajashekar Talari Srinivas, Suresh Kumar K, K Hanumanthayya, Priya Ravikumar
    New to Alopecia Areata? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide →
    Image
    Studysummary This study found that treating patchy alopecia areata with fractional CO2 laser and topical triamcinolone acetonide was more effective and safer than intralesional triamcinolone, despite higher initial discomfort, as it resulted in greater patient satisfaction and fewer adverse effects like skin atrophy.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    This study compared the efficacy and safety of fractional CO2 laser with topical triamcinolone acetonide versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (ILS) in treating alopecia areata (AA) in 60 patients. Group A (30 patients) received fractional CO2 laser with topical triamcinolone, while Group B (30 patients) received ILS. Both groups underwent five treatment sessions at 3-week intervals. Results showed that Group A had significantly better efficacy, with higher GPA-scale and LAD score improvements (P < 0.001). Despite higher discomfort (VDS) in Group A, patient satisfaction (VAS) was also higher (P < 0.001). Notably, 30% of Group B experienced skin atrophy. The study concluded that fractional CO2 laser with topical triamcinolone acetonide is more effective and safer than ILS for AA treatment.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    15 / 15 results