Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Versus Lichen Planopilaris: A Clinicopathological Study

    Enrique Poblet, Francisco Jimenez, Alejandro Pascual, Enric Piqué
    Image of study
    TLDR The conclusion is that FFA and LPP have similar scalp biopsy features, making them hard to distinguish histologically, and FFA may be a specific kind of scarring hair loss.
    The study analyzed scalp biopsies from 16 patients, 8 with Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) and 8 with lichen planopilaris (LPP), to compare their clinicopathological features. Results indicated that both conditions had similar histopathological findings, such as lymphocytic infiltrate and concentric fibrosis around hair follicles, but FFA presented with more apoptotic cells and less follicular inflammation than LPP. Additionally, FFA did not affect the interfollicular epidermis, which was sometimes involved in LPP cases. Direct immunofluorescence was negative in FFA but positive in some LPP cases. Despite these findings, the study concluded that there were no definitive histological differences to distinguish between FFA and LPP based solely on histology, and suggested that FFA might represent a specific type of lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia. However, the small sample size calls for further research to confirm these conclusions.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    5 / 5 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 393 results
      Diffuse hair loss and scalp biopsies

      community Diffuse hair loss and scalp biopsies

      in Research  692 upvotes 4 months ago
      Scalp biopsies are crucial for diagnosing hair loss conditions like Diffuse Unpatterned Alopecia (DUPA) and retrograde hair loss, as treatments like finasteride and dutasteride may not be effective if other conditions are present. Combining PPAR-GAMMA agonists with retinoids could improve treatments for conditions like Lichen Planopilaris.

      community Fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution

      in Research/Science  14 upvotes 9 months ago
      A user has been experiencing hair loss for 4 years, with treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, and various supplements proving ineffective. They were diagnosed with fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, a condition that may require a combination of anti-inflammatory and hair growth treatments.

      community I think I’ve finally found the reason for my hair loss

      in Chat  98 upvotes 2 weeks ago
      The user experienced hair loss since 2019 and tried finasteride, dutasteride, RU58841, and ketoconazole shampoo without success. A scalp biopsy showed scarring and inflammation from folliculitis, indicating chronic inflammation was affecting treatment effectiveness.

      community 9 months on Fin - no progress , should I get on Dutasteride?

      in Chat  10 upvotes 1 month ago
      The user has been using finasteride, minoxidil, and nizoral for hair loss but hasn't seen regrowth, only maintenance. They are considering switching to dutasteride, which is believed to be more effective, but are concerned about potential side effects.

      community Testosterone and hair loss seeming irrelevance

      in Research/Science  81 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about the role of testosterone in hair loss and the effectiveness of different treatments. The conclusion is that DHT is the main culprit for hair loss, and finasteride has been proven to work long-term in maintaining and regrowing hair. Testosterone may have a minor effect, but it is not the primary cause of hair loss.

      community I tried salt water to stop the DHT itch

      in Treatment  60 upvotes 2 years ago
      Treating the itch associated with male pattern baldness, which is believed to be caused by DHT. Potential treatments discussed include salt water, finasteride, ketoconazole, and RU58841.

    Related Research

    5 / 5 results