Hair Transplantation Controversies

    October 2017 in “ Dermatologic Surgery
    Marc R. Avram, Robert Finney, Nicole E. Rogers
    From the encyclopedia
    Platelet-Rich Plasma →

    growth factors taken from your blood and injected into your scalp to stimulate hair

    Hair Transplant →

    Hair transplantation moves DHT-resistant follicles from a donor area (back and sides of the scalp) into thinning or bald areas. The transplanted hair is generally permanent, though surrounding native hair can keep thinning.

    Image
    Studysummary This review examines controversies in hair transplant surgery, including donor harvesting techniques and the roles of platelet-rich plasma and low-level light therapy, and reports no new clinical results. Our plain-language summary of this paper — not a Tressless recommendation.
    The 2017 document "Hair Transplantation Controversies" reviewed debates in hair transplant surgery, particularly focusing on donor harvesting techniques, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and low-level light therapy. It concluded that while hair transplants yield natural-looking results, the best methods for the procedure are still debated, with elliptical donor harvesting and follicular unit extraction (FUE) being the main techniques discussed. The document highlighted a single-blinded study with 40 patients that showed significant benefits of PRP in hair regrowth, with the PRP group experiencing over 75% hair regrowth at 6 months post-operation. The authors emphasized the importance of proper candidate selection, surgical skill, and postoperative care, and suggested that future research will further elucidate the role of PRP in hair transplantation and hair loss treatment.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    18 / 18 results