TLDR Pig ear skin is better than human skin for testing how well barrier creams block allergens from entering hair follicles.
The study compared the efficacy of barrier emulsions in preventing pollen allergen penetration into hair follicles using two in vitro models: excised human skin and porcine ear skin. It was found that porcine ear skin was a more suitable model due to its lack of contraction post-removal, unlike human skin which contracts and may not accurately represent follicular penetration. The results indicated that porcine ear skin provided a better platform for analyzing follicular penetration, suggesting that excised human skin might not be reliable for such studies.
Cited in this study
6 / 6 results
182 citations
,
December 2007 in “BJCP. British journal of clinical pharmacology/British journal of clinical pharmacology” Hair follicles significantly increase the speed and amount of caffeine absorbed through the skin.
132 citations
,
November 2007 in “European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics” The microemulsion delivered the dye deeper into the skin than the cream.
27 citations
,
January 2006 in “Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces” Researchers found that bulge cells from human hair can grow quickly in culture and have properties of hair follicle stem cells, which could be useful for skin treatments.
109 citations
,
December 2005 in “The journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings/The Journal of investigative dermatology symposium proceedings” Targeting hair follicles can improve skin treatments and reduce side effects.
141 citations
,
December 2005 in “International journal of pharmaceutics” Hair follicles may soon be used more for targeted and systemic drug delivery.
162 citations
,
August 2005 in “The journal of investigative dermatology/Journal of investigative dermatology” The new "differential stripping" method effectively measures how much substance gets into hair follicles.