Improving Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Discovery and Preclinical Evaluation

    August 2009 in “ Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
    Jeremy O. Jones
    Image of study
    TLDR We need better ways to test and understand SARMs to make safer and more effective treatments.
    The document from 2009 addresses the challenges in developing selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) and the need for better preclinical evaluation methods. It emphasizes the importance of understanding AR selectivity at the molecular level to create safer and more effective treatments for conditions like androgenic alopecia, prostate cancer, and muscle wasting. The paper suggests that current evaluation methods, such as the Hershberger assay, may not accurately predict safety and efficacy, and advocates for the use of quantitative gene transcription as a more accurate endpoint. It also proposes the development of an AR selectivity transcription profile and the use of cell-based assays with tissue-selective AR-responsive promoters for SARM discovery. The document concludes that a more comprehensive preclinical model should include all AR-responsive tissues and measure AR activity in both male and female animals to better predict human outcomes.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    5 / 5 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 178 results

      community The most nuclear stack possible

      in Satire  37 upvotes 1 week ago
      A user humorously suggests an extreme hair loss treatment regimen involving multiple medications and therapies, including Dutasteride, Minoxidil, RU58841, and others, claiming it would prevent hair loss but with potential side effects like gynecomastia. The conversation highlights concerns about safety, side effects, and the effectiveness of such a comprehensive approach.

      community So we’re just ok with taking a research chemical now?

      in Treatment  177 upvotes 4 years ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841, a non-FDA approved research chemical for hair loss, with mixed opinions on its safety and effectiveness. Some users are willing to try it as a last resort after other treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride failed, while others express concerns about potential long-term side effects and lack of official research.

      community Why is Kevin Mann (Haircafe) Hated?

      in Chat  62 upvotes 1 year ago
      Hair loss treatments, including microneedling, minoxidil, finasteride and RU58841; the efficacy of these treatments; criticisms of Kevin Mann's content related to his selective data presentation and biases towards certain treatments; and other topics such as DHT being labeled a "trash hormone" and critiques of other hairloss YouTubers.

    Similar Research

    6 / 1000+ results