In Vitro and In Vivo Structure-Activity Relationships of Novel Androgen Receptor Ligands with Multiple Substituents in the B-Ring

    September 2005 in “ Endocrinology
    Jiyun Chen, Dong-Jin Hwang, Kiwon Chung, Casey E. Bohl, Scott J. Fisher, Duane D. Miller, James T. Dalton
    Image of study
    TLDR Certain changes to the B-ring of androgen receptor ligands can increase their effectiveness for potential treatments of muscle and bone conditions.
    The document from December 2005 details a study on the development of novel selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) by synthesizing 29 nonsteroidal AR ligands and analyzing their structure-activity relationships, particularly the impact of substituents in the B-ring on AR binding affinity and pharmacological activity. The study found that AR binding affinity was enhanced with electron-withdrawing substituents in the B-ring, with the most potent compounds having Ki values as low as 1.0 nM. In vitro assays using CV-1 cells showed that compounds with two substituents in the B-ring maintained or improved transcriptional activation. In vivo testing on castrated rats with 15 compounds demonstrated that structural modifications in the B-ring significantly influenced pharmacological activity and selectivity, with halogen groups at specific positions increasing activity. The study concluded that the design of novel SARMs with improved pharmacological activity could be guided by these findings, potentially benefiting treatments for muscle-wasting diseases, osteoporosis, and other androgen-related conditions. However, the exact number of rats used in the in vivo studies was not specified in the summary.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    2 / 2 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 1000+ results

      community The most nuclear stack possible

      in Satire  35 upvotes 2 weeks ago
      A user humorously suggests an extreme hair loss treatment regimen involving multiple medications and therapies, including Dutasteride, Minoxidil, RU58841, and others, claiming it would prevent hair loss but with potential side effects like gynecomastia. The conversation highlights concerns about safety, side effects, and the effectiveness of such a comprehensive approach.

      community So we’re just ok with taking a research chemical now?

      in Treatment  181 upvotes 4 years ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841, a non-FDA approved research chemical for hair loss, with mixed opinions on its safety and effectiveness. Some users are willing to try it as a last resort after other treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride failed, while others express concerns about potential long-term side effects and lack of official research.

      community Why is Kevin Mann (Haircafe) Hated?

      in Chat  62 upvotes 1 year ago
      Hair loss treatments, including microneedling, minoxidil, finasteride and RU58841; the efficacy of these treatments; criticisms of Kevin Mann's content related to his selective data presentation and biases towards certain treatments; and other topics such as DHT being labeled a "trash hormone" and critiques of other hairloss YouTubers.

    Similar Research

    5 / 1000+ results