Evaluation of Efficacy of Follicular Unit Extraction Versus Follicular Unit Extraction With Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Cicatricial Alopecia

    Ali Fouad Elariny, Nasser Ghozlan, Sherif Wasief, Aya Elsayed Moussa, Marwa Eldeeb
    New to Platelet-Rich Plasma? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide →
    Image
    Studysummary This study found that follicular unit extraction, with or without platelet rich plasma, is effective for hair restoration in cicatricial alopecia, though PRP does not significantly impact graft survival rates. Our plain-language summary of this paper — not a Tressless recommendation.
    The study "Evaluation of efficacy of follicular unit extraction versus follicular unit extraction with platelet rich plasma in treatment of cicatricial alopecia" involved 20 patients with cicatricial alopecia (CA) who were divided into two groups. Group A (10 patients) underwent follicular unit extraction (FUE), while Group B (10 patients) underwent FUE with platelet rich plasma (PRP). PRP was injected 1 week before surgery, then monthly after surgery for 3 months. The study found that in Group A, the mean survival rate of hair grafts increased significantly to 78.15% at 12 months. In Group B, the mean survival rate was 69.74% at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference between both groups at any time during the follow-up period. The study concluded that FUE is a preferred procedure for hair restoration in CA with few side effects, and the role of PRP in hair transplantation is controversial as it does not significantly affect the survival rate of hair grafts.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    17 / 17 results