Best Practices for FACE-Q Aesthetics Research: A Systematic Review of Study Methodology

    May 2023 in “ Aesthetic Surgery Journal ”
    Lucas Gallo, Patrick Kim, Morgan Yuan … Anne F. Klassen
    Studysummary This study highlights ongoing limitations in the administration and reporting of FACE-Q Aesthetic scale data, recommending that future research follow the User's Guide for proper administration and scoring, justify the study's time frame, and provide sample size calculations for key outcomes.
    Automatically generated from the study's abstract, not written by a person, and not a review of the full paper. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Read the original study, and consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    Read the full study on academic.oup.com →
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study 6

    1. Long-Term Evaluation of Endoscopic and Pretrichial Open Forehead Lifts: A Morphometric Analysis Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2022
    2. Comparison of a Novel Silicone Gel Wound Dressing vs Bacitracin After Follicular Unit Extraction Hair Transplantation Aesthetic surgery journal · 2021
    3. Evaluating the Satisfaction of Patients Undergoing Hair Transplantation Surgery Using the FACE-Q Scales Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2019
    4. The Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Hair Transplantation Satisfaction in Male Androgenetic Alopecia Patients Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · 2018
    5. Assessing the Efficacy of Deoxycholic Acid for the Treatment of Submental Fat: A Three-Dimensional Study Aesthetic surgery journal · 2018
    6. Safety and Effectiveness of VYC-15L, a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Lip and Perioral Enhancement: One-Year Results From a Randomized, Controlled Study Dermatologic surgery · 2017