Assessment of Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures for Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Scoping Review

    Emadodin Darchini‐Maragheh, Anthony Moussa, Huw Rees, Leslie N. Jones, Laita Bokhari, Rodney Sinclair
    New to Alopecia Areata? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide →
    Studysummary This review discusses the limitations of existing clinician-reported outcome measures for alopecia areata and emphasizes the need for a composite scoring system to better assess disease severity.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    This systematic scoping review identifies and evaluates 16 clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROMs) for assessing alopecia areata (AA) severity, highlighting the lack of consensus on the most appropriate tool. The study reviewed 14 articles from a pool of 1376, focusing on ClinROMs that measure scalp hair loss, disease activity, and nonscalp areas. The review underscores the practical limitations of existing tools, which hinder their widespread use in clinical practice. The authors conclude that there is a significant need for a comprehensive clinical severity scoring system that encompasses all key severity indicators, not just scalp involvement.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    21 / 21 results