Search

everythinglearnresearchcommunity

for

Search:↓

Home-use light devices can significantly reduce hair but are less effective on very dark skin and slower than professional devices.

Newer skin resurfacing lasers reduce damage and scarring, with some approved for safe use and minimal side effects.

Blue light therapy is safe for skin and may protect against UV radiation.

Laser hair removal works well for people with dark hair and light skin, but it's less effective for light hair or dark skin; improvements are expected.

Home-use medical-cosmetic devices like lasers for hair removal may be convenient but need more research to confirm safety and effectiveness.

Dermatologists should customize cosmetic treatments for dark-skinned patients to minimize risks and complications.

Low fluence photoepilation temporarily removes hair by targeting the hair follicle's pigmented area without severe damage.

A low-power, fast laser safely reduces hair with minimal pain and few side effects.

Combining LFQS and IPL is more effective and faster for treating melasma than LFQS alone.

The IPL device is safe, effective, and has high patient satisfaction for hair removal.

Higher fluences in 808-nm diode laser treatments are more effective for axillary hair removal.

Low-level laser therapy may help with hair regrowth in alopecia areata but its effectiveness for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis needs more research.

Home-use lasers and IPL devices are unlikely to directly cause paradoxical hair growth; it may be linked to inflammation or hormonal issues.

The combined technology safely and effectively removes hair at home on dark skin.

Home-based skin care devices are generally safe and effective for hair removal, promoting hair growth, treating wrinkles and acne, but results for psoriasis treatment are mixed.

Laser hair removal effectiveness depends on targeting hair structures without harming the skin, and improvements require more research and expert collaboration.

Higher light doses cause more damage to hair follicles, predicting better hair removal results.

No single treatment is clearly effective for central serous chorioretinopathy.

Laser hair removal is popular for long-term hair reduction but carries risks, requiring well-trained operators and better regulations, especially in South Africa.

The home-use IPL device effectively reduced hair and delayed its regrowth after six months of use, with users happy and no negative side effects.

Laser and light treatments can effectively remove hair long-term.

At-home laser and light devices can safely reduce acne and hair growth when used correctly but are less effective than professional treatments.

Nd:YAG laser can reduce hair with multiple treatments, but permanent removal isn't guaranteed.

Laser-assisted drug delivery has shown improved treatment outcomes for skin conditions and has potential to reduce side effects and treatment time.

Intense pulsed light treatment mainly damages pigmented hair parts but spares stem cells, allowing hair to regrow.

Photodynamic therapy can remove nonpigmented hair in mice and might work for humans.

Lasers are FDA-approved for permanent hair reduction, not removal, and more research is needed to improve treatments.

Home-use cosmetic laser and light devices show modest results for hair removal and acne treatment, but more research is needed for confirmation.

The study aims to find the best treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy by comparing various options.

The hot-wire hair removal device is no better than shaving.