 21 citations
,
  January 2022   in “Biomaterials Science”
           21 citations
,
  January 2022   in “Biomaterials Science”    RNA delivery is best for in-body use, while RNP delivery is good for outside-body use. Both methods are expected to greatly impact future treatments.  
      60 citations
,
  July 2020   in “ACS Nano”
           60 citations
,
  July 2020   in “ACS Nano”    Using CRISPR for gene editing in the body is promising but needs better delivery methods to be more efficient and specific.  
      
    Gene editing holds promise for skin treatments but needs careful safety and ethical consideration.  
      June 2022   in “Authorea (Authorea)”
           June 2022   in “Authorea (Authorea)”    Efficient delivery systems are needed for the clinical use of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.  
      June 2024   in “International Journal of Nanomedicine”
           June 2024   in “International Journal of Nanomedicine”    CRISPR/Cas9 has improved precision and control but still faces clinical challenges.