Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacoeconomics of Three Common Strategies for Pediatric Alopecia Areata Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

    Jinqiu Zhou, Yang Yang, Min Xu, Zhongfa Lyu, Xianjie Wu
    Image of study
    TLDR Traditional treatment for pediatric alopecia areata is most effective and should be first choice.
    In a retrospective cohort study of 24 pediatric patients with alopecia areata (AA), three treatment strategies were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics. The traditional treatment group had a 100% (12/12) success rate in achieving complete hair regrowth (SALT100), while in the tofacitinib group, 40% (2/5) reached at least 50% hair regrowth (SALT50), and another 40% (2/5) achieved complete regrowth (SALT100). In the microneedling (MN) group, 42.86% (3/7) were non-responders, but another 42.86% (3/7) achieved complete regrowth (SALT100). All treatments had mild adverse effects, with no treatment discontinuations due to these effects. The study concluded that traditional treatment should be the first-line approach for newly diagnosed or treatment-naive pediatric AA patients, while tofacitinib and microneedling could be considered for severe, long-duration, or refractory cases, with the caveat that MN is more time-intensive and expensive.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Cited in this study

    12 / 12 results

    Related

    3 / 3 results