Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Use of Micrografting Technology in Humans

    Rawan Almujaydil, Yu Yan, Sandra Olivia Kuswandani, Faisal F. Alotaibi, Jean Suvan, Nguyen Thuy Ba Linh, Francesco D’Aiuto
    Image of study
    TLDR Micrografting may improve healing and hair growth, but more research is needed.
    The systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of micrografting technology, particularly the Rigenera system, across various medical conditions, including burns, wounds, ulcers, vitiligo, and androgenetic alopecia. It included 55 studies, with 7 focusing on androgenetic alopecia. One study with 100 participants showed an increase in hair density from 15 to 48.5 hairs/cm² after 2 months of treatment. The review found that micrografting may lead to shorter healing times and improved outcomes, but the evidence was inconsistent with a moderate risk of bias and high heterogeneity. Further research is needed to standardize protocols and establish clinical guidelines, although micrografting shows potential benefits, especially when traditional treatments are inadequate.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    7 / 7 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    1 / 1 results

      community Is this regrowth? My doctor took these photos and said I looked better.

      in Satire  142 upvotes 4 months ago
      The conversation humorously discusses an extensive and exaggerated hair loss treatment regimen, including finasteride, dutasteride, minoxidil, pyrilutamide, RU58841, and various other therapies. Despite the numerous treatments, the effectiveness is questioned, and the user humorously considers adding more minoxidil.

    Similar Research

    5 / 278 results