Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Saline Solution as a Preservation Solution for Hair Transplantation

    Rasha Abdelkader, Sahar Ahmed Abdalbary, Ibrahim A. Naguib, Kyrillos Makarem
    New to Platelet-Rich Plasma? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide →
    Studysummary This study found that preserving hair grafts in platelet-rich plasma before implantation significantly improved hair density, graft uptake, and hair thickness compared to saline preservation in hair transplantation patients. Our plain-language summary of this paper — not a Tressless recommendation.
    The study compared the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) versus saline solution as preservation solutions for hair transplantation in 50 participants. Results indicated that PRP-preserved hair grafts had significantly higher survival rates, better hair density, and improved hair thickness compared to saline-preserved grafts. PRP-preserved grafts showed a graft uptake of 93.3% versus 76.6% in the saline group, with hair density peaking at 203.7 ± 39.9 after 1 year. Participants in the PRP group experienced over 75% hair regrowth after 6 months and reported a mean satisfaction rate of 7.1 out of 10. The study concluded that PRP is a superior preservation solution for hair grafts, enhancing the success of hair transplantation surgeries, though further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is recommended.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    9 / 9 results