Clinical and Trichoscopic Analysis of PRP Versus GFC for Male and Female Pattern Hair Loss

    June 2025 in “ Dermatologic Surgery
    Suruchi Garg, Aparna Thirumalaiswamy
    Image of study
    TLDR GFC improves hair quickly, while PRP offers longer-lasting benefits; using both sequentially is recommended.
    This study compared the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and growth factor concentrate (GFC) in treating male and female pattern hair loss. It involved 42 patients, with 25 receiving PRP and 17 receiving GFC, each undergoing three treatment sessions. Results indicated that GFC led to better outcomes in total hair count, shaft diameter, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores, with significant improvements after the second session. GFC also showed more bulbar enlargement, while PRP resulted in more erythema and angiogenesis. At 6 months, PRP demonstrated better hair diameter and GAIS scores, suggesting a more sustained effect. The study concludes that both treatments improve hair parameters, with GFC providing quick improvement and PRP offering long-term benefits, recommending sequential treatments for sustainable results.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    5 / 5 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 113 results

    Related Research

    6 / 6 results