15 citations
,
January 2024 in “The AAPS Journal” This study demonstrates that bioequivalence for proposed 50-mg ritlecitinib capsules versus clinical 100-mg capsules can be supported using a PBPK model-based biowaiver, achieving over 90% probability of success.
10 citations
,
October 2009 in “Clinical Therapeutics” This study found that the orally disintegrating tablet and standard tablet formulations of finasteride met bioequivalence criteria in fasting healthy adult male Han Chinese volunteers, although there was a significant difference in time to maximum concentration.
6 citations
,
December 2011 in “Drug Research” This study concluded that Flaxin tablets and the reference formulation are bioequivalent in terms of absorption rate and extent when administered as a single 5 mg dose to healthy male volunteers.
4 citations
,
December 2011 in “Drug Research” This study found that two different 5 mg finasteride tablet formulations are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption in healthy volunteers.
3 citations
,
January 2015 in “Journal of drug assessment” This study found that five 0.1 mg dutasteride capsules are bioequivalent to one 0.5 mg dutasteride capsule in healthy adult males under fasting conditions, and both were well tolerated.
2 citations
,
September 2011 in “Chiang Mai Medical Journal - เชียงใหม่เวชสาร” This study demonstrated that the 5-mg generic finasteride tablet is bioequivalent to the original tablet when tested in healthy Thai male volunteers.
1 citations
,
January 2003 in “Zhongguo yaoke daxue xuebao” This study determined that finasteride test and reference tablets are bioequivalent in human participants, as no significant differences were found in their pharmacokinetic parameters.
January 2009 in “Chinese Journal of Drug Application and Monitoring” This study concluded that finasteride granules are bioequivalent to finasteride tablets based on pharmacokinetic evaluation in healthy male volunteers.
January 2005 in “Chinese New Drugs Journal” This study concluded that locally manufactured finasteride tablets are bioequivalent to imported ones based on pharmacokinetic profiles in male volunteers.
January 2012 in “Pharmacy Today” This study concluded that two formulations of finasteride were bioequivalent based on Cmax, AUC, and Tmax data from healthy volunteers.
January 2010 in “Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy” This study found that finasteride test and reference tablets are bioequivalent in healthy male volunteers, with no significant differences in their pharmacokinetic parameters.
January 2005 in “Zhongguo yaofang” This study found that domestic and imported finasteride tablets were bioequivalent in terms of their pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability in human volunteers.
January 2005 in “Zhōnghuá yàoxué zázhì” This study concluded that two different finasteride tablet formulations are bioequivalent based on their pharmacokinetic profiles in a crossover trial with male subjects.
January 2005 in “Yaowu fenxi zazhi” This study concluded that domestic and imported finasteride tablets are bioequivalent, with no significant differences in their pharmacokinetics among healthy volunteers.
January 2004 in “Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies” This study concluded that two different brands of finasteride tablets are bioequivalent based on their pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability.
This study found that the finasteride tablet and capsule are bioequivalent to the control finasteride tablet in healthy volunteers.
This study concluded that domestic and imported finasteride tablets are bioequivalent, showing no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters among healthy volunteers.
January 2003 in “The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology” In this study, the authors concluded that the tested and reference finasteride tablets showed bioequivalence in healthy male volunteers.
1 citations
,
January 2014 This review discusses various methods to assess bioequivalence between dermatologic drugs and highlights the potential of visual inspection and percutaneous penetration research.
April 2006 in “Journal of Korean Pharmaceutical Sciences” January 2005 in “Journal of Elinical Research” This study found that the pharmacokinetic profile of finasteride capsules and tablets in healthy volunteers is bioequivalent.
September 2005 in “日本医療薬学会年会講演要旨集”
4 citations
,
May 2019 in “Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences” This study found that a dutasteride tablet formulation using cyclodextrin complex, solubilizing polymer, and surfactant achieved similar bioavailability in beagle dogs to that of a commercial capsule.
March 2004 in “Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology” This study found that the vehicle of hydrocortisone impacts its absorption and therapeutic effectiveness, as demonstrated by efficacy tests using UV-erythema and vasoconstriction models.
January 2007 in “Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army” In this study, the researchers found that two formulations of finasteride tablets were bioequivalent in Chinese healthy male volunteers.
1 citations
,
January 2016 in “Hair transplant forum international” This article compiles internet forum posts discussing differences between brand-name and generic finasteride pills, but it presents no new clinical findings.
38 citations
,
February 2005 in “The journal of sexual medicine” This study found that a testosterone patch and gel showed bioequivalent testosterone levels in hypogonadal men, but the patch mimicked a natural circadian profile, while the gel resulted in higher dihydrotestosterone levels.
33 citations
,
December 2005 in “British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology” This study found that the Transdermal Delivery System efficiently delivers testosterone systemically and showed bioequivalent hormone concentrations to a known topical gel in healthy males.
2 citations
,
June 2003 in “PubMed” The two finasteride formulations are bioequivalent.
1 citations
,
April 2015 in “Drug research” This study concluded that two different pharmaceutical formulations of finasteride were bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption based on pharmacokinetic evaluations in a randomized crossover study with 38 volunteers.