Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia and Lichen Planopilaris

    Matthew Harries, Andrew G. Messenger
    Image of study
    TLDR The critique highlights an error in a review about hair loss treatment, stressing the need for accurate information and caution due to poor evidence quality.
    The document discusses a critique of a study by Racz et al. on the treatment of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) and lichen planopilaris. The critique, by Harries and Messenger, points out an error in Racz et al.'s review regarding the effectiveness of oral finasteride treatment for FFA. Racz et al. had reported a 'partial response' in a series of 16 patients with FFA treated with finasteride, but Harries and Messenger clarify that only 7 of those 16 were actually treated with finasteride, and the main treatment was intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. All patients except one followed this treatment and saw a halt in hair loss progression over 24 months. The critique emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting the limited literature on FFA, noting that the quality of evidence is poor and treatment outcomes are often imprecise and subjective. They also highlight the importance of accurate study representation in reviews to aid clinicians in making informed treatment decisions.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    4 / 4 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 393 results

      community Testosterone and hair loss seeming irrelevance

      in Research/Science  81 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about the role of testosterone in hair loss and the effectiveness of different treatments. The conclusion is that DHT is the main culprit for hair loss, and finasteride has been proven to work long-term in maintaining and regrowing hair. Testosterone may have a minor effect, but it is not the primary cause of hair loss.
      Diffuse hair loss and scalp biopsies

      community Diffuse hair loss and scalp biopsies

      in Research  692 upvotes 4 months ago
      Scalp biopsies are crucial for diagnosing hair loss conditions like Diffuse Unpatterned Alopecia (DUPA) and retrograde hair loss, as treatments like finasteride and dutasteride may not be effective if other conditions are present. Combining PPAR-GAMMA agonists with retinoids could improve treatments for conditions like Lichen Planopilaris.

      community Fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution

      in Research/Science  14 upvotes 9 months ago
      A user has been experiencing hair loss for 4 years, with treatments like minoxidil, finasteride, and various supplements proving ineffective. They were diagnosed with fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, a condition that may require a combination of anti-inflammatory and hair growth treatments.

      community 9 months on Fin - no progress , should I get on Dutasteride?

      in Chat  10 upvotes 1 month ago
      The user has been using finasteride, minoxidil, and nizoral for hair loss but hasn't seen regrowth, only maintenance. They are considering switching to dutasteride, which is believed to be more effective, but are concerned about potential side effects.

      community scarring alopecia awareness in this community

      in Chat  33 upvotes 2 years ago
      Lichen Planopilaris (LPP), a form of permanent hair loss, which can be mistaken for seborrheic dermatitis and is characterized by scalp itching, burning, redness, and dandruff. Treatment options discussed include steroidal creams, finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841.

      community How essential is scalp biopsy when dealing with hair loss?

      in Treatment  6 upvotes 1 month ago
      The user experienced hair loss despite using Fin and Min for 12 years and switched to Dutasteride, RU58841, and Keto scalp serum, but shedding and itch persist. They are considering increasing Dutasteride to 2.5mg and questioning the necessity of a scalp biopsy, with mixed opinions on its usefulness.

    Similar Research

    6 / 1000+ results