Technical Procedures for Preparation and Administration of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Related Products: A Scoping Review

    Daniela Vianna Pachito, Ângela Maria Bagattini, Arací Malagodi de Almeida, Alfredo Mendrone‐Júnior, Rachel Riera
    Image of study
    TLDR The review found that the way Platelet-Rich Plasma is made varies a lot, which can change the results of medical treatments.
    The scoping review by Pachito et al. from December 2020 analyzed 39 studies to assess the variability in technical procedures for preparing and administering Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and related products. The review found significant differences in PRP processing methods, which could affect clinical trial outcomes for various medical conditions. It highlighted the lack of standardization in PRP preparation, with variations in commercial kits, anticoagulants, activation methods, and centrifugation protocols impacting platelet, leukocyte, and growth factor concentrations. For instance, different commercial kits produced varying levels of growth factors, and anticoagulants like EDTA affected platelet morphology and viability. Activation methods and centrifugation protocols also influenced growth factor release and cell proliferation. The addition of certain substances to PRP could alter its characteristics, such as reducing tenocyte proliferation or increasing growth factor release. The review underscored the need for standardized PRP preparation protocols to optimize clinical outcomes, as the current variability in processing leads to inconsistent results. However, due to the lack of clinical trials comparing different PRP preparation methods, no definitive conclusions could be drawn about the best practices for PRP processing in terms of efficacy and safety.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    4 / 4 results

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 77 results

      community Do Platelet-rich plasma, PRP work?

      in Research/Science  14 upvotes 1 year ago
      Someone's brother tried Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for hair loss; it had minimal effect on hair but improved skin appearance. Microneedling at home was suggested as a more sustainable alternative.

      community Thoughts on platelet-rich plasma therapy

      in Treatment  3 upvotes 3 weeks ago
      Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy for hair loss is expensive, painful, and often ineffective, with mixed reviews on its benefits. Alternatives like minoxidil, finasteride, and hair transplants are suggested as more reliable options.

      community Why can't you drink caffeine after PRP?

      in Treatment  9 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation discusses avoiding caffeine after Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) treatment for hair loss because caffeine is a vasoconstrictor, which can reduce blood flow and hinder the healing process that PRP aims to promote.

      community I just made my own PRP - DIY PRP

      in Research/Science  549 upvotes 1 year ago
      The post and conversation are about a user who made their own Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) for hair loss treatment at home, using their own blood and a centrifuge. The responses vary, with some users supporting the DIY approach to save money, others expressing concern about the safety and effectiveness of the method, and a few joking about the lengths people will go to combat hair loss.

      community Anyone have PRP/Exosome results to share?

      in Treatment  3 upvotes 1 year ago
      Considering alternative treatments to hair loss, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and exosome therapy, instead of using medications like minoxidil, finasteride/dutasteride.

    Similar Research

    5 / 1000+ results