Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Wiesbaden 30CH Versus Supportive Haircare In Reducing Telogen Effluvium: A Comparative Study

    J Priyanka, Merin Jose
    Image
    Studysummary This non-randomized trial observed that Wiesbaden 30CH was more effective than supportive haircare for telogen effluvium, with 53.3% showing moderate improvement compared to 20% for haircare, although a notable portion in both groups saw no improvement.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    The study evaluated the effectiveness of Wiesbaden 30CH versus supportive haircare in reducing telogen effluvium in a sample of 30 patients aged 18-45. The results showed that Wiesbaden 30CH led to marked improvement in 13.3% of cases and moderate improvement in 53.3%, while supportive haircare resulted in marked improvement in 26.7% of cases and moderate improvement in 20%. Overall, Wiesbaden 30CH demonstrated higher effectiveness in improving telogen effluvium compared to supportive haircare.
    Discuss this study in the Community →