Analysis of Alopecia Areata Surveys Suggests a Threshold for Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Yael Renert‐Yuval, Joel Corrêa da Rosa, Sandra Garcet, Ana B. Pavel, Jennifer Bares, Margot Chima, Jason E. Hawkes, Patricia Gilleaudeau, Mary Sullivan‐Whalen, Giselle Singer, James G. Krueger, Emma Guttman‐Yassky
    New to Alopecia Areata? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide →
    Studysummary This study found that the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS) is a better tool than the Alopecia Areata Quality of Life Index (AA-QLI) for assessing patient-reported outcomes in alopecia areata.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    This study analyzed the effectiveness of two alopecia areata-targeted questionnaires, the Alopecia Areata Quality of Life Index (AA-QLI) and the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS), in assessing patient-reported outcomes. It found that AASIS was more effective in correlating with alopecia areata severity and clinical response. The study suggested that achieving a SALT score of ≤ 20, indicating 20% or less scalp hair loss after treatment, should be considered a threshold for meaningful therapeutic outcomes. This threshold could guide clinicians and improve the design of future clinical trials, as patients with this level of hair loss reported improvements in various quality-of-life aspects.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study

    9 / 9 results