Thoughts on a previous stack m
    Product 12/28/2024

    At a glance
    In this treatment experience post, the primary subjects mentioned are
    💉 Thymosin B-4 (injections) 1 year
    💧 GHK-Cu with Zn-Thymulin (topical) 1 year
    💊 Oral Dutasteride (oral)
    the tone is reflective with Topical Dutasteride worked, unsure about others results.

    Other terms

    The conversation discusses past and current hair loss treatments, with the user reflecting on expensive peptide treatments like topical Dutasteride, Latanoprost, and others, which were ultimately deemed less effective than oral Dutasteride and Minoxidil. The user now prefers the latter due to their cost-effectiveness and efficacy.
    View this post in the Community →

    Similar Community Posts Join

    5 / 1000+ results

      community My personal experience/observations fighting AGA seriously for 5 years

      in Treatment  42 upvotes 3 weeks ago
      Minoxidil with alcohol and propylene glycol was more effective than non-alcohol versions, and RU58841 worked best in a non-water-based solution. Oral finasteride showed better results than topical, despite side effects; microneedling and tretinoin worsened hair loss, and PRP was only helpful when younger.

      community On a super stack, but still miniaturizationg going strong???

      in Update  9 upvotes 2 years ago
      User "Number_Worried00" is using a treatment stack for hair loss, including Minoxidil, Finasteride, Dutasteride, Estradiol, Cetirizine, and Pyrilutamide. Another user suggests that if the cause is vitamin deficiency or inflammation, the stack may not be effective.

    Related Research

    6 / 1000+ results