61 citations
,
October 2005 in “The journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings/The Journal of investigative dermatology symposium proceedings” This review discusses scalp skin disorders, their overlapping symptoms, diagnostic techniques, and treatment strategies, emphasizing the importance of accurate differential diagnosis, but reports no new clinical results.
1 citations
,
January 2021 in “Research Square (Research Square)” This study found that the AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 Diagnosis may offer a more sensitive and timely diagnostic tool for COVID-19 than conventional rtPCR testing, especially enhancing potential treatment timing.
1 citations
,
January 2021 in “medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)” This study reports that the AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 Diagnosis provides a quicker, more sensitive, and inexpensive alternative to rtPCR-SARS-CoV-2 with an accuracy above 80% in diagnosing COVID-19.
September 2025 in “The Open Dermatology Journal” In this study, the Tibot AI application showed high diagnostic accuracy for adnexal and pigmentary disorders and cutaneous tumors in dermatology, but was less effective for immunological disorders and infestations, suggesting the need for further dataset refinement.
December 2020 in “Research Square (Research Square)” This study found that the AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 Diagnosis is a feasible, sensitive, and cost-effective tool with higher accuracy than most rtPCR-SARS-CoV-2 tests for diagnosing COVID-19.