Pretrimmed Versus Direct Nonshaven Follicular Unit Extraction

    March 2017 in “ Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open ”
    Jae Hyun Park, Seung Hyun You
    Studysummary This study found that both pretrimmed and direct nonshaven follicular unit extraction techniques are effective for hair transplantation, with pretrimmed having a higher calculated density and longer time requirement than direct.
    Automatically generated from the study's abstract, not written by a person, and not a review of the full paper. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Read the original study, and consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    Read the full study on journals.lww.com →
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study 7

    1. Eyebrow Restoration: The Approach, Considerations, and Technique in Follicular Unit Transplantation Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · 2015
    2. Eyelash Transplantation Using Leg Hair by Follicular Unit Extraction Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2015
    3. Novel Technique of Follicular Unit Extraction Hair Transplantation with a Powered Punching Device Dermatologic Surgery · 2008
    4. New Methodology and Instrumentation for Follicular Unit Extraction: Lower Follicle Transection Rates and Expanded Patient Candidacy Dermatologic Surgery · 2008
    5. Guidelines for Pubic Hair Restoration Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · 2006
    6. New Methodology and Instrumentation for Follicular Unit Extraction Dermatologic Surgery · 2006
    7. Follicular Unit Extraction: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hair Transplantation Dermatologic Surgery · 2002

    Related research 3

    1. Using Nonscalp Hair in Scalp Hair Restoration: Theory and Execution Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2021
    2. Diseases of the Hair and Scalp in Asians That Are of Interest to Hair Surgeons 2017
    3. Hair Transplantation for Men and Women Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2006