Use of Low-Cost Videomicroscopy Versus Standard Videodermatoscopy in Trichoscopy: A Controlled, Blinded Noninferiority Trial

    January 2015 in “ Skin appendage disorders ”
    Anna Elisa Verzì, Francesco Lacarrubba, Giuseppe Micali
    Studysummary This study suggests that while low-cost videomicroscopes can correctly identify hair shaft alterations, they may be unreliable for detailed follicular and perifollicular trichoscopic examination compared to standard videodermatoscopes.
    Automatically generated from the study's abstract, not written by a person, and not a review of the full paper. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Read the original study, and consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    Read the full study on karger.com →
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Research cited in this study 5

    1. Scalp Dermoscopy or Trichoscopy Current problems in dermatology · 2015
    2. Trichoscopy in Alopecias: Diagnosis Simplified International Journal of Trichology · 2013
    3. Hair and Scalp Dermatoscopy Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology · 2012
    4. Trichoscopy Update 2011 Journal of Dermatological Case Reports · 2011
    5. Dermatoscopy: Alternative Uses in Daily Clinical Practice 2011

    Related research 4

    1. Baricitinib Results in Eyebrow and Eyelash Growth in Patients With Alopecia Areata Who Do Not Achieve 20% or Less Scalp Hair Loss Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology · 2022
    2. Trichoscopy as a Useful Method to Differentiate Tinea Capitis from Alopecia Areata in Children at Zagazig University Hospitals International Journal of Dermatology · 2016
    3. Role of Trichoscopy in Children's Scalp and Hair Disorders Pediatric Dermatology · 2013
    4. Videodermoscopy in the Evaluation of Hair and Scalp Disorders PubMed · 2007