Hair Loss Myths: Evaluating Common Misconceptions with Evidence

    July 2017 in “ PubMed ”
    Gabriella DiMarco, Amy Mcmichael
    Studysummary This review highlights that many common beliefs about hair loss lack strong scientific support and emphasizes directing patients toward proven treatments with established efficacy.
    Automatically generated from the study's abstract, not written by a person, and not a review of the full paper. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Read the original study, and consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    Read the full study on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov →
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Related research 9

    1. A Case of Contact Allergic Dermatitis to Topical Minoxidil Cureus · 2021
    2. Hair Loss in Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: Not Always Irreversible Skin appendage disorders · 2020
    3. The Use of Trichoscopy to Assess the Efficacy of Topical Minoxidil 2% Solution in Patients with Female Pattern Hair Loss Zagazig university medical journal · 2019
    4. The Efficacy of Topical Minoxidil for Non-Scarring Alopecia: A Systematic Review PubMed · 2019
    5. Off-Label Use of Topical Minoxidil in Alopecia: A Review American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · 2019
    6. Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost Versus Minoxidil and Betamethasone Valerate on the Treatment of Alopecia Areata Journal of Dermatological Treatment · 2017
    7. Scalp Psoriasiform Contact Dermatitis with Acute Telogen Effluvium Due to Topical Minoxidil Treatment Skin appendage disorders · 2015
    8. Alopecia Areata: Evidence-Based Treatments Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery · 2009
    9. The Treatment of Alopecia Areata PubMed · 1987