TLDR A new automated method accurately measures hair damage using microscopic images.
The study developed a novel quantitative measure for assessing hair surface damage using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images, focusing on automation and characterization of morphological damage after exposure to explosive blasts. The automated analysis used a tailing factor, which measures asymmetry in pixel brightness histograms as a proxy for surface roughness, achieving 81% classification accuracy compared to an existing damage classification system. This method demonstrated the ability to score features of hair damage related to explosion conditions, indicating its broad applicability for assessing diverse morphological features of hair damage.
8 citations
,
January 2016 in “Skin research and technology” The 12-point scale is better for evaluating small changes in hair condition after using hair care products.
37 citations
,
October 2015 in “PeerJ” Perming significantly changes hair's molecular structure, while shampoo and conditioner do not.
29 citations
,
August 2011 in “PubMed” Hair and nail proteins, mainly keratins, are crucial for structure and can indicate health issues.
27 citations
,
April 2011 in “International journal of legal medicine” In situ DNA labeling in hair can help predict forensic DNA analysis success.
34 citations
,
January 2011 in “Annals of dermatology/Annals of Dermatology” Using a hair dryer at 15 cm with continuous motion causes less damage than natural drying.
26 citations
,
April 2010 in “The American journal of dermatopathology/American journal of dermatopathology” Researchers created a standard system to grade hair damage using microscopic images.
20 citations
,
January 2003 in “Journal of oleo science” Chemical treatments and daily stresses damage hair, especially the cuticle layer.