91 citations
,
January 2009 in “International Journal of Trichology” This review discusses the advantages and limitations of various hair loss evaluation methods but reports no new results; it emphasizes the importance of cautious interpretation for these diagnostic tools.
This review explores the evaluation methods and biological parameters involved in hair growth assessment, highlighting their distinct applications and advantages, but presents no new clinical findings.
January 2015 in “Hair therapy & transplantation” This review updates on various methods for hair and scalp examination, encompassing non-invasive, semi-invasive, and invasive techniques, and reports no new results.
5 citations
,
February 2014 in “PubMed” This review highlights the need for standardization of diagnostic techniques for hair diseases and emphasizes their importance in distinguishing conditions and monitoring treatment effects, but it reports no new experimental results.
41 citations
,
July 2002 in “Clinical and Experimental Dermatology” This review evaluates hair growth measurement methods for human scalp hair, suggesting that combining highly resolutive analytical approaches with global calibrated methods is recommended for assessing hair changes in clinical settings.