TLDR Vertical sections are better than horizontal sections for diagnosing alopecia.
In their 2005 article, Almut Böer and Katharina Hoene challenged the notion that horizontal sections are superior to vertical sections for diagnosing alopecias. They argued that a qualitative approach using vertical sections is usually sufficient for precise diagnosis, and that the anagen/telogen ratio, often assessed in horizontal sections, is not as relevant for diagnosis. The authors suggested that specific criteria applied to vertical sections can diagnose most alopecias with specificity. They also mentioned the emergence of non-invasive techniques like computer-assisted phototrichograms, which can assess hair loss severity and treatment effects without the need for repeated biopsies. The conclusion was that vertical sections, using reliable and repeatable criteria, are more precise and correct for diagnosing alopecia than horizontal sections.
41 citations,
July 2002 in “Clinical and Experimental Dermatology” Effective hair loss assessment requires a mix of precise measurement methods.
22 citations,
May 2002 in “Skin Research and Technology” CE-PTG detects early hair follicle issues in balding areas, helping measure male hair loss.
71 citations,
March 1995 in “Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology” Using both vertical and transverse sections for alopecia biopsies improves diagnosis without extra cost.
309 citations,
May 1993 in “Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology” Horizontal scalp biopsy sections effectively diagnose and predict MPAA, with follicular density and inflammation impacting hair regrowth.
42 citations,
December 1990 in “The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology” The study found that horizontal sections of scalp biopsies are better for analyzing hair loss, showing fewer hairs and more fine hairs in balding areas.
91 citations,
January 2009 in “International Journal of Trichology” Different hair evaluation methods have their own pros and cons, and using multiple methods together is best for accurate hair loss diagnosis and tracking.
35 citations,
January 2014 in “BioMed Research International” Female pattern hair loss involves hormonal factors, genetics, and may be linked to low ferritin levels.
212 citations,
September 2015 in “Journal of Investigative Dermatology” The document provides a method to classify human hair growth stages using a model with human scalp on mice, aiming to standardize hair research.
15 citations,
February 2003 in “British Journal of Dermatology” The study suggests computer-assisted analysis of scalp biopsies could improve hair loss diagnosis but needs more validation.
33 citations,
January 2005 in “Dermatology” Trichoscan is a reliable method for measuring hair growth and monitoring treatment effectiveness in hair loss.