Evaluation of Using Stromal Vascular Fraction and Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia

    A B Osama, Elfeky K Ahdallah, E K M Ali, N A Mamdouh
    Image of study
    TLDR SVF and PRP improve hair loss, but SVF causes more side effects.
    The study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and adverse effects of using lipo-aspirate stromal vascular fraction (SVF) versus platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Forty randomized patients were treated with PRP and SVF, and each lesion was treated by those modalities. Patients received three sessions with one-month intervals for three months, followed up after three months. The results indicated a significant improvement in AGA after both PRP and highly significant after SVF therapy. The study suggests that both modalities could effectively and safely be used to treat AGA. However, SVF showed highly significant pain, headache, and erythema as side effects, but no serious adverse events.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Related Community Posts Join

    2 / 2 results

      community How does dutasteride regrowth work?

      in Finasteride/Dutasteride  6 upvotes 7 months ago
      A 25-year-old man with hair loss from bleach damage is using oral minoxidil and considering adding Dutasteride for better regrowth and prevention. He seeks advice on Dutasteride's effectiveness and potential benefits over finasteride, and is also curious about RU58841.

      community This guy claims stem cells fixed his balding

      in Is this regrowth?  301 upvotes 1 year ago
      A man who claimed to have regrown his hair using stem cell treatment, sparking a debate about its effectiveness and cost. Some users suggested he might be using other treatments or substances, while others shared their own experiences with stem cell therapy for hair loss.

    Similar Research

    5 / 1000+ results