Conventional Suture Material Versus Staplers in the Closure of Donor Area in Hair Transplant: Which Is Better?
January 2015
in “
Hair therapy & transplantation
”
New to Hair Transplant? There is a guide in the encyclopedia. Read the guide → 
Studysummary This study reports that both prolene and staplers are effective for closing the donor area in hair transplants, but staplers offer convenience and time efficiency. Our plain-language summary of this paper — not a Tressless recommendation.
The study, involving 28 patients with androgenetic alopecia, compared the use of conventional suture material (prolene) and staplers for closing the donor wound area in hair transplants. After a six-month follow-up, it was found that both methods were equally effective in terms of scar formation, with average scar widths of 1.28 mm for prolene and 1.35 mm for staplers. Despite the similarity in cosmetic outcomes, staplers were noted to be more convenient, requiring less surgical skill and reducing procedure time, suggesting that staplers may be a more efficient option for donor area closure in hair transplant surgeries.
