Response to Dr. Rassman’s Opinion on the Future of Hair Restoration Surgery

The conversation discusses hair transplant experiences and decisions, focusing on whether individuals would choose the same doctor again. Treatments mentioned include Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841.

A 22-year-old stabilized hair loss with oral finasteride and minoxidil but sees minimal regrowth. They received conflicting transplant advice, with graft recommendations from 1,600 to 4,000, and concerns about diffuse thinning and donor area.

The user is considering a hair transplant after 4 years of using finasteride, minoxidil, microneedling, and scalp massages for hair regrowth. Opinions differ, with some suggesting continuing current treatments and others recommending a transplant to reduce maintenance.

There is skepticism about new hair loss treatments, with the belief that current options like minoxidil, finasteride, and hair transplants are the best available. Concerns are raised about the systemic side effects of androgen-related treatments, even those marketed as topical, and doubts about the effectiveness of emerging treatments like clascoterone.

Hair cloning for hair loss is unlikely to be available or affordable in the next 10 years. Current treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841 are still the main options, with skepticism about new advancements.

The conversation discusses potential future hair loss treatments, including SCUBE3, hair follicle cloning, and GT20029, with mentions of past disappointments like CosmeRNA and hopes for treatments like Verteporfin for infinite donor hair.