Reliability of the pattern hair loss classifications: A comparison of the basic and specific and Norwood–Hamilton classifications

    October 2012 in “The Journal of Dermatology
    Hannah Hong, Jae Hong Ji, Yoon-Hee Lee, Hoon Kang, Gwang Seong Choi, Won‐Soo Lee
    Image of study
    TLDR The BASP classification is more reliable than the Norwood-Hamilton for classifying hair loss in men and women.
    In the 2012 study involving 40 medical professionals (8 dermatological specialists, 17 dermatological residents, and 15 general physicians), the Basic and Specific (BASP) classification system was found to be more reliable and reproducible than the Norwood-Hamilton classification for pattern hair loss (PHL) when used to classify PHL in 100 sets of photographs of Korean male alopecia patients. The BASP classification, particularly the basic type (BA), demonstrated higher match rates for both intergroup reproducibility and intragroup repeatability compared to the Norwood-Hamilton classification, which also had limitations in its applicability to only male pattern hair loss and inability to classify certain types of baldness. The study concluded that the BASP classification is superior in terms of reliability and applicability to various hair loss patterns and both sexes.
    View this study on onlinelibrary.wiley.com →

    Cited in this study