Long-Term Superiority of Composite Versus Muscle-Only Free Flaps for Skull Coverage

May 2004 in “ Annals of Plastic Surgery ”

Geoffrey G. Hallock

free flaps muscle-only free flaps composite free flaps implant extrusion chronic ulcerations muscle atrophy

TLDR Composite flaps are better than muscle-only flaps for long-term skull coverage.

The retrospective review analyzed 14 free flaps in 12 patients for skull coverage from 1982 to 2003, comparing muscle-only and composite free flaps. It was found that muscle-only free flaps were more prone to serious long-term complications like implant extrusion and chronic ulcerations, likely due to flap thinness from muscle atrophy or initial inadequate thickness. With a mean follow-up of 43.0 months for muscle-only flaps and 23.7 months for composite flaps, the study concluded that for a permanent, trouble-free outcome, initial selection should favor composite flaps or sufficiently thick muscle flaps, indicating the potential long-term superiority of composite flaps for skull coverage.

View this study on journals.lww.com →

Discuss this study in the Community →

Related Community Posts Join

6 / 1000+ results

community Anyone else find it funny all of us on here stress about hair loss daily and take pills for it and take time everyday to apply minoxidil or RU meanwhile we all have friends who don’t even think about hairloss rocking their perfect NW0 hairlines and thick hair?

in Chat 259 upvotes 3 years ago

People on a forum are discussing the irony of stressing over hair loss and using treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride, while others have naturally perfect hair without any effort. They share personal experiences and acknowledge that everyone has insecurities, with some accepting their situation and others finding it frustrating.

community Just find a cure already, I am totally done

in Chat 161 upvotes 3 months ago

The conversation is about hair loss treatments, with users recommending finasteride and minoxidil as effective solutions. Some users report side effects, but overall, the consensus is to use these treatments rather than waiting for a cure.

community Who here has maintained with finasteride for decades?

in Finasteride/Dutasteride 133 upvotes 1 year ago

People have been using finasteride for 10 to 20+ years to maintain their hairline, with many reporting success and no significant side effects. Some users have combined finasteride with minoxidil for better results, and a few have switched to dutasteride or added hair transplants when finasteride was less effective.

community So we have 20k dollars human like machines available but no new effective treatment for hairloss since finasteride :)

in Chat 237 upvotes 2 months ago

There have been no new effective hair loss treatments since finasteride, despite technological advancements. Current treatments include finasteride, minoxidil, and RU58841, with ongoing challenges and potential future solutions in research.

community FINASTRIDE and switch to DUTASTRIDE, my experience

in Progress Pictures 138 upvotes 3 months ago

The user shared their experience with Finasteride and Dutasteride for hair loss. They initially had success with Finasteride but switched to Dutasteride after experiencing shedding, which continued, and are now considering a hair transplant.

community 3 Weeks After the Hair Transplant (before the ugly duckling phase). In my 20s, got some hope back

in Progress Pictures 292 upvotes 1 year ago

A user who underwent a hair transplant in their twenties and are now discussing the best treatments for long-term management of hair loss, such as finasteride and Minoxidil, as well as potential alternative treatment options like RU58841.

Related Research

1 / 1 results

research Long-Term Superiority of Composite Versus Muscle-Only Free Flaps for Skull Coverage

14 citations, May 2004 in “Annals of Plastic Surgery”

Composite flaps are better than muscle-only flaps for long-term skull coverage.