Generic Development of Topical Dermatologic Products: Formulation Development, Process Development, and Testing

    October 2012 in “ The AAPS Journal
    Rong‐Kun Chang, Andre Raw, Robert Lionberger, Lawrence X. Yu
    Image
    Studysummary This review discusses strategies for developing semi-solid topical generic products to match the quality of reference-listed drugs, using concepts like quality by design and reverse-engineering, but reports no new results.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    The 2012 document provides comprehensive guidance on the development of generic topical dermatologic products, focusing on the importance of quality by design (QbD) and the need to achieve similar quality attributes to the reference-listed drug (RLD). It emphasizes the necessity of reverse-engineering the RLD to ensure qualitative and quantitative formulation similarity (Q1/Q2), as well as microstructural similarity (Q3). The document highlights the role of in vitro skin permeation studies in justifying formulation differences and supporting bioequivalence studies, and the importance of in vivo bioequivalence studies, including pharmacodynamic tests like the vasoconstrictor activity test for corticosteroids. It also discusses the critical aspects of formulation design, process development, testing, and regulatory requirements, including the avoidance of unwanted ingredient interactions, the selection of solvents, the impact of viscosity, and the use of preservatives and antioxidants. The document underscores the complexity of formulating generic topical products and the importance of maintaining the drug product's physical and chemical properties throughout its shelf-life, characterizing the RLD, and ensuring patient acceptance for commercial success. Stability data is crucial for regulatory filing, and a biowaiver may be granted under certain conditions, although in vivo bioequivalence studies are generally required.
    Discuss this study in the Community →