Assessing Diagnostic Skill in Dermatology: A Comparison Between General Practitioners and Dermatologists

    September 2005 in “ Australasian Journal of Dermatology ”
    Hue Tran, Keng Chen, Adrian Lim, James Jabbour, Stephen Shumack
    Image of study
    TLDR Dermatologists are more accurate than general practitioners in diagnosing skin conditions, especially skin cancer.
    In a 2005 retrospective study involving 656 GP referrals to dermatology services, it was found that general practitioners (GPs) had a 42% agreement rate with dermatologists on clinical diagnoses and a 24% agreement rate when histological confirmation was available, compared to dermatologists' 77% agreement rate. GPs were more accurate in diagnosing conditions like acne, warts, alopecia areata, and benign naevi but had difficulty with skin tumors and other specific skin conditions. The study, with its large sample size and real-world context, suggested the need for better dermatological training for GPs, particularly in skin cancer diagnosis, and recommended a low threshold for specialist referrals. Despite its retrospective nature and the lack of a provisional diagnosis in 42% of cases, the study provided valuable insights into the diagnostic discrepancies between GPs and dermatologists.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 581 results

      community DHT and 5AR respect post, it's importance within the brain

      in Research/Science  111 upvotes 9 months ago
      The conversation discusses whether to use finasteride for hair loss, considering its role in inhibiting DHT and 5AR, which can affect brain function and mood. Some users report anxiety and depression from finasteride, while others do not experience these side effects and emphasize the importance of DHT for brain and prostate health.

      community So we’re just ok with taking a research chemical now?

      in Treatment  179 upvotes 3 years ago
      The conversation discusses the use of RU58841, a non-FDA approved research chemical for hair loss, with mixed opinions on its safety and effectiveness. Some users are willing to try it as a last resort after other treatments like Minoxidil and Finasteride failed, while others express concerns about potential long-term side effects and lack of official research.

      community Oral min 2.5mg closing in on 3 months

      in Progress Pictures  372 upvotes 1 year ago
      _the_orange_box_'s experience using oral minoxidil, with discussion about finasteride and the potential side effects of both treatments. Other users shared their own experiences related to hair loss treatments.

      community GT20029 China Phase II Trial For AGA Reached Primary Endpoint

      in Research/Science  134 upvotes 8 months ago
      The GT20029 tincture, a topical androgen receptor degrader, showed significant hair growth and good safety in a China Phase II trial for male androgenetic alopecia (AGA), with the 1% dose twice weekly identified as optimal. The company plans to initiate Phase III trials in China and Phase II in the U.S., and the treatment also shows promise for acne.

      community Anyone else growing tired of the finasteride wars?

      in Finasteride/Dutasteride  169 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation is about differing experiences with finasteride for hair loss, with some users reporting side effects and others not, and the debate over the drug's safety and effectiveness. Specific treatments mentioned include finasteride, dutasteride, and topical finasteride.

    Related Research

    1 / 1 results