Is ARTAS or NeoGraft a better hair transplant procedure?

    ← back to Hair Transplant

    Surveyed from the published FAQs of 14 hair transplant providers. The percentage on each highlighted claim is the share of surveyed providers who make that claim on their own sites — it shows how common a claim is, not that it is true. Hover to see who.

    Also asked as: “Is Artas better than NeoGraft?” · “ARTAS System vs. NeoGraft?” · “What is the advantage of the ARTAS robot versus Neograft?” · “What is the advantage of the ARTAS® robot versus NeoGraft™?”

    Both ARTAS and NeoGraft are effective79%Stated by 79% of the providers we surveyed. Including Premier Center for Hair Restoration, Smart Hair Transplant, Core Plastic Surgery, Aesthetic Scalp Chicago, California Hair MD, Blackhawk Hair Restoration, and 3 more. hair transplant systems, according to most providers. This indicates that either option can potentially yield satisfactory results for hair restoration.

    About half of providers claim that ARTAS is considered a state-of-the-art robotic system36%Stated by 36% of the providers we surveyed. Including New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Dr. Burt Steffes, Smart Hair Transplant, and 2 more. for hair transplantation. Some providers highlight that ARTAS is a robotic system29%Stated by 29% of the providers we surveyed. Including California Hair MD, Blackhawk Hair Restoration, New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery, and 1 more., emphasizing its advanced technology. Additionally, about a quarter assert that ARTAS offers unparalleled precision21%Stated by 21% of the providers we surveyed. Including Dr. Burt Steffes, Smart Hair Transplant, New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery. in extracting and transplanting hair, and that ARTAS is almost entirely automated21%Stated by 21% of the providers we surveyed. Including Core Plastic Surgery, Smart Hair Transplant, New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery.. In practice it is robot-assisted, and the surgical team still plans and performs key steps. ARTAS uses 3D imaging and artificial intelligence21%Stated by 21% of the providers we surveyed. Including The Lumen Center, Premier Center for Hair Restoration, Dr. Burt Steffes. to create a scalp map for each patient. Clinics say this helps avoid over-harvesting21%Stated by 21% of the providers we surveyed. Including Aesthetic Scalp Chicago, The Lumen Center, Premier Center for Hair Restoration., but that still depends on the surgeon's planning. Some providers mention that ARTAS may result in a shorter procedure time21%Stated by 21% of the providers we surveyed. Including Core Plastic Surgery, Smart Hair Transplant, New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery. due to its precision and efficiency.

    Some providers describe NeoGraft as a handheld manual FUE device29%Stated by 29% of the providers we surveyed. Including Aesthetic Scalp Chicago, Blackhawk Hair Restoration, Smart Hair Transplant, and 1 more. with built-in suction. Clinics say NeoGraft is effective when in professional hands29%Stated by 29% of the providers we surveyed. Including Premier Center for Hair Restoration, New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Smart Hair Transplant.. Both devices are forms of FUE. Both leave many small dot scars in the donor area, and results depend mainly on the surgical team rather than the device.

    There are conflicting claims about NeoGraft. A minority state that NeoGraft can often produce larger graft counts14%Stated by 14% of the providers we surveyed. Including The Lumen Center, Smart Hair Transplant., appealing for extensive hair restoration. However, another minority highlight that NeoGraft allows the surgeon to perform the procedure without creating manual incisions14%Stated by 14% of the providers we surveyed. Including Core Plastic Surgery, Smart Hair Transplant., suggesting a different procedural approach.

    What clinics say

    Claims from clinics' own websites

    In their own words — the 9 clinics whose published guidance fed this answer.

    1. … two systems are both effective, but the ARTAS system has some important benefits for patients.
      Premier Center for Hair Restoration Wexford, US
    2. Neograft allows us to utilize more donor sites rather than only posterior scalp and sides of the scalp utilized by the ARTAS robot.
      Smart Hair Transplant Skokie, US
    3. While there are a host of nuances to hair transplantation, harvesting issues are nearly eliminated with ARTAS.
      Aesthetic Scalp Chicago Chicago, US
    4. With the ARTAS robotic hair transplant system, the robot removes the follicles directly from your scalp and then injects them into your balding area.
      Blackhawk Hair Restoration Danville, US
    5. While both techniques are effective, ARTAS offers the advantage of being almost entirely automated, reducing the room for error and ensuring consistent …
      Core Plastic Surgery Birmingham, US
    6. Both the ARTAS and the Neograft are FUE or follicular unit extraction devices commonly used in hair restoration surgery. The ARTAS is the only robotic surgical device in the world. The punch that extracts hair follicles is housed…
      California Hair MD Beverly Hills, US
    7. Both technologies dramatically improve the accuracy and speed of FUE harvest compared to previous manual extraction instruments.
      New Horizons Center for Cosmetic Surgery Skokie, US
    8. The ARTAS iX and NeoGraft systems are both effective, but the ARTAS iX system has some important benefits for patients.
      The Lumen Center Bryn Mawr, US
    9. One option may be better for you than the other.
      Eterna M.D. Medical Rejuvenation Center Lake Mary, US