Unpopular Opinion: hair cloning kind of sucks as a potential future cure.
    Technology 1/28/2025

    At a glance
    In this general discussion post, the primary subjects mentioned are the tone is 😐 neutral.

    Other terms

    Hair cloning is seen as a distant and potentially less relevant solution for hair loss due to its high cost, invasiveness, and the advancement of other treatments like Minoxidil and finasteride. Many believe that by the time hair cloning becomes viable, other less invasive and more effective treatments will be available.
    View this post in the Community →

    Similar Community Posts Join

    6 / 1000+ results

    Related Research

    6 / 1000+ results
      Clinical Updates in Hair

      research Clinical Updates in Hair

      19 citations , January 1997 in “Dermatologic Clinics”
      Most treatments for hair loss in 1997 were not effective for most people, and maintaining hair growth was difficult.
      The History of Hair Transplantation

      research The History of Hair Transplantation

      3 citations , December 2008 in “The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery”
      Hair transplantation has evolved to refined techniques like FUE and FUT, with Finasteride and Minoxidil as the only other proven treatments for hair loss.
      Contemporary Hair Transplantation

      research Contemporary Hair Transplantation

      54 citations , August 2009 in “Dermatologic Surgery”
      Modern hair transplants use small grafts for a natural look and drugs to prevent further loss, with high patient satisfaction.
      Hair Transplantation: State of the Art

      research Hair Transplantation: State of the Art

      June 2002 in “Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery”
      Hair transplantation has improved to more natural-looking results and is complemented by effective non-surgical treatments, with ongoing research into hair follicle cloning.