A new hair loss treatment using dermal exosomes can restore up to 90% of lost hair in mice. Users discuss potential human trials and compare it to Minoxidil and Finasteride.
The conversation discusses Pyrilutamide for hair loss, with skepticism about its legitimacy and mentions of an upcoming press release from Kintor. It also references ongoing trials and includes links for further information.
The post and conversation discuss the effectiveness of pyrilutamide for hair loss, with comparisons to finasteride and RU58841. Users express skepticism due to failed trials and high costs, with some waiting for more data before trying pyrilutamide.
Kintor is accused of using fake pictures to promote their product, Pyrilutamide (KX826), which failed Phase 3 trials. Users express disappointment and note similar false advertising has occurred with finasteride and minoxidil.
Some users report no difference in hair loss when using creatine with finasteride, while others believe intense training, not creatine, may contribute to hair loss. One user experienced improved hair quality using dutasteride, minoxidil, and creatine, despite initial shedding.
The conversation discusses the safety and effectiveness of continuing or adding RU58841 after stopping finasteride for hair loss treatment. One user expresses skepticism about using RU58841 due to the lack of full human trials.
Amplifica is testing a compound called AMP-303 for hair loss, but it's not Scube3 or osteopontin. The timing for the results from the clinical trial is unknown.
Creatine may increase DHT levels, potentially accelerating hair loss in those predisposed to male pattern baldness. Some users report no change in DHT when using creatine without training.
The review discusses traditional hair loss treatments like minoxidil and finasteride, and newer options like Low-Level Laser Therapy, microneedling, and platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia. It highlights the need for more high-quality trials to assess these treatments' effectiveness and standardized protocols for emerging therapies.
There is no reliable ranking for the effectiveness of topical anti-androgens like Fluridil, RU58841, and Pyrilutamide, with limited studies available. Some users suggest Pyrilutamide may be promising based on ongoing trials, while Fluridil combined with finasteride has shown positive results for some individuals.
Pyrilutamide is an experimental hair loss treatment, with users discussing its availability and cost from sources like Anagen Inc, Actifolic, and MinoxidilMax. Some users express concerns about product authenticity and suggest waiting for further trial results to assess its safety and effectiveness.
The conversation discusses the legitimacy of purchasing Pyrilutamide (KX-826) for hair loss treatment. Users mention using Minoxidil and express interest in waiting for phase 3 trials for safety and efficacy confirmation.
The conversation discusses a hair loss treatment formulation containing cyclosporin, minoxidil, and tacrolimus, and mentions ongoing research on hair color reversal. The treatment showed high efficacy in restoring hair color in trials with 40 to 50 people.
The conversation discusses the potential of kintor pyrilutamide as a promising treatment for hair loss, with ongoing trials in various phases. There is skepticism due to delays in trial results, but the company is actively pursuing further trials.
A user with alopecia totalis, borderline universalis, seeks advice on getting into a Xeljanz trial or appealing insurance for coverage. They experienced significant hair regrowth but are now seeing hair loss again and want to try Xeljanz.
An 18-year-old decided to start taking finasteride for hair loss, justifying it by stating that finasteride is the most effective treatment available and that the risk of side effects is low, with clinical trials showing it stops hair loss in 80% of men. The user encourages others not to be deterred by negative forum posts and to consider their own experience and clinical data.
The conversation is about finding an affordable, sulfate-free shampoo for regular use alongside Nizoral to improve scalp health affected by minoxidil. Suggestions include NOT YOUR MOTHER'S Naturals Coconut Milk & African Marula Tree Oil High Moisture Shampoo and Mane and Tail Hair & Body Shampoo.
A new topical treatment called RT1640 claims to reverse AGA using cyclosporine A, Minoxidil, and a new chemical entity, RT175. Users are skeptical due to lack of clinical trial data and inconsistent before-and-after photos.
A new treatment using dermal sheath cup cells may regrow hair and could require repeat treatments every 8 years. Users discuss ongoing trials and plan to use finasteride and minoxidil until the treatment is available.
Minoxidil and finasteride are the only FDA-approved treatments for androgenetic alopecia, while newer treatments like clascoterone, PP405, NV-623/624, AMP-303, and RU58841 are still experimental with varying levels of evidence. Clascoterone shows the most promise due to strong human data, while AMP-303 has notable early human trial results; RU58841 lacks human data and remains experimental.
Concerns about the long-term safety of VDPHL01, an extended-release minoxidil, due to potential risks similar to Cantu syndrome, were raised, highlighting the lack of monitoring for chronic connective tissue changes. The conversation suggests that while the treatment may improve hair growth, it could lead to issues not detected in short-term trials.
A user is concerned about hair loss in the temple area despite using Minoxidil and finasteride for 10 months and is curious if PP405 can help. Responses indicate uncertainty about PP405's effectiveness, with some optimism about future treatments and AI speeding up drug discovery, but emphasize waiting for clinical trial results.
The conversation discusses a personalized hair loss treatment plan based on DNA test results, recommending Minoxidil, Dutasteride, 17-alpha Estradiol, Cetirizine, and PRP sessions. The test identifies a high risk of hair loss due to DHT but a good response to Minoxidil, suggesting a tailored approach to treatment.
A new hair loss treatment, PP405, showed promising Phase 2a results with 31% of patients experiencing over 20% hair density increase without systemic absorption, avoiding hormonal side effects. The treatment is expected to be expensive, with Phase 3 trials starting mid-2026, and there is skepticism about the data's strength.
A 36-year-old has been using oral finasteride (1 mg daily) and topical minoxidil twice a day since September 2023, and added LLLT (helmet) to their routine 2 months ago, seeing positive changes. They also use Ketoconazole shampoo, rotate other medical shampoos, train regularly, eat clean, and manage stress.
Hair transplants in Turkey often involve high-volume, low-quality procedures with untrained staff, leading to unreliable results. Many users recommend choosing experienced surgeons who perform fewer surgeries per day, even if it means paying more in countries like Switzerland, Spain, or Thailand.
Finasteride is effective for DHT/AR-driven hair loss but not for chromosome 20-driven cases, where treatments like minoxidil, prostaglandin analogs, and low-level laser therapy may be more beneficial. Genetic testing can help determine the underlying cause of hair loss to tailor treatment effectively.
Oral minoxidil boosted vertex hair but not the hairline, with a stack including 5mg minoxidil, 2mg dutasteride, topical foam minoxidil, fluridil, and Nizoral. Users discuss dosing strategies, with some suggesting 2.5mg twice daily for sustained levels, while others recommend 5mg once daily based on clinical trials.
Discussion on hair loss treatments, focusing on Breezula, with mentions of Minoxidil, finasteride, RU58841, Pyrilutamide, GT20029, and PP405. Breezula's effectiveness is uncertain, with some trials showing minimal regrowth.
The conversation discusses the potential of PP405 as a hair loss treatment, with some users expressing skepticism and others hopeful about its development. There is also mention of other treatments like Minoxidil, Finasteride, and Pyrilutamide, with users debating the effectiveness and safety of self-experimentation versus waiting for clinical trial results.