Side effects of CHOP in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    December 1997 in “ Cancer Nursing
    John Sitzia, Cathy North, Jenny Stanley, Nicky Winterberg
    TLDR CHOP chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma commonly causes hair loss, fatigue, taste changes, and nausea.
    This study investigated the side effects of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen in 19 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, who completed 99 treatment cycles and returned 74 questionnaires. Alopecia was the most common side effect, with all patients experiencing hair loss by the third cycle. Fatigue and taste changes were also prevalent, affecting 77% and 74% of patients, respectively. Nausea was identified as the most troublesome side effect, particularly in the early stages of treatment, followed by fatigue, taste changes, constipation, and difficulty sleeping. The findings highlighted a wide range of side effects associated with CHOP, suggesting the need for further research into these issues.
    Discuss this study in the Community →

    Related Community Posts Join

    6 / 1000+ results

    Similar Research

    5 / 1000+ results
      Mucocutaneous Reactions to Chemotherapy

      research Mucocutaneous Reactions to Chemotherapy

      275 citations , March 1999 in “Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology”
      Chemotherapy can cause various skin reactions, with hair loss being the most common, and proper diagnosis and treatment of these reactions are important.
      Tamoxifen-Induced Total Alopecia

      research Tamoxifen-Induced Total Alopecia

      19 citations , June 2001 in “Annals of Internal Medicine”
      Tamoxifen can cause total hair loss but its benefits outweigh this side effect.
      Rituximab for Bone Lymphoma

      research Rituximab for Bone Lymphoma

      5 citations , June 2001 in “Annals of Internal Medicine”
      Rituximab effectively treated a woman's bone lymphoma that was resistant to other treatments.
      The Efficacy of Spiritual Healing

      research The Efficacy of Spiritual Healing

      1 citations , June 2001 in “Annals of Internal Medicine”
      The document concludes that there is no credible evidence that distant healing works, and it should not be further studied in medical literature.