Revision of the Unfavorable Result in Hair Transplantation
May 2005
in “
Seminars in Plastic Surgery
”
TLDR The document concludes that correcting poor hair transplants requires a careful plan and a mix of techniques to achieve a natural look and address various challenges.
The 2005 document addresses the correction of unfavorable outcomes in hair transplantation, focusing on the distinction between errors in judgment, such as poor planning for progressive hair loss and inappropriate hairline design, and errors in technique, like outdated grafting methods and improper graft preparation. It highlights the necessity of a natural-looking hairline and the challenges of working with high-contrast hair and skin colors. The paper suggests that revision surgeries often require a combination of techniques and a comprehensive approach, including modifying old grafts and adjusting low hairlines. It also discusses the specific issues related to hair loss from cosmetic surgery, noting the effectiveness of small grafts in scar tissue and the importance of avoiding tension that could exacerbate hair loss. The document underscores the need for a careful preoperative assessment and a logical approach to revision, given the limited options available. It does not provide specific study participant numbers but focuses on general principles and strategies for improving hair transplantation results.
