PSS21 Gap Analysis for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures for Alopecia

    May 2011 in “ Value in Health
    Brooke Dennee-Sommers, N. Galipeau, Kristina Fitzgerald, Catherine J Evans, Stephen D. Daniels, Burgess S
    Image
    Studysummary This review assessed patient-reported outcome measures for alopecia treatments but found that none met current FDA guidelines; however, some could potentially be adapted for more comprehensive use.
    Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
    The document presents a gap analysis aimed at identifying a suitable patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for treatments in alopecia. The search across MEDLINE®, PROQOLID, and PROLabels databases resulted in 45 instruments, of which 23 were patient-reported, 17 were investigator-rated, three were devices, and two were objective hair measures. After applying exclusion criteria, 41 instruments were discarded, leaving four for further consideration: the Kingsley Alopecia Questionnaire (KAP), the Hair Growth Questionnaire, the Hair Problem List, and the Women's Androgenic Alopecia Quality of Life Questionnaire (WAA-QOL). However, none of these instruments fully met the FDA's PRO Guidance requirements. The Hair Growth Questionnaire, developed based on male input only, could potentially be revised for relevance to women with alopecia. The Hair Problem List and the WAA-QOL might be supplemented to include more concepts of interest and tested for relevance to both men and women with alopecia.
    Discuss this study in the Community →