TLDR FUE is a less invasive hair restoration method with potential to become standard, offering benefits like reduced scarring and pain, but requires experience to minimize risks.
In 2009, Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) was described as a hair restoration technique that individually removes follicular units, offering advantages like less invasiveness, reduced pain, and no linear scarring. Challenges included a high transection risk and a steep learning curve, with initial transection rates at 5.6%, which could be reduced to less than 2% with experience. The SAFE System, using a dull punch, was developed to lower transection rates, with reported rates between 1.3% and 4% depending on the punch size. FUE was also less tissue-removing compared to traditional strip harvesting and allowed patients to wear hair short. The document noted the potential for FUE to become the standard for graft production due to improvements in techniques and instruments, predicting decreased operating times and costs, and the advent of mechanized and robotic technologies. However, the document also acknowledged the scarcity of published reports on FUE and based its information on anecdotal evidence.
2 citations
,
March 2006 in “International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery” Transplanted hair keeps growing like the donor hair, even in bald areas.
27 citations
,
January 2006 in “Dermatologic Surgery” The SAFE System for hair transplants results in low damage to follicles and could make the procedure suitable for more patients.
8 citations
,
January 1996 in “Springer eBooks” Male pattern baldness may be caused by factors like poor blood circulation, scalp tension, stress, and hormonal imbalances, but the exact causes are still unclear.
1 citations
,
January 2024 in “Updates in clinical dermatology”
29 citations
,
January 2010 in “PubMed” FUE hair transplants offer minimal scarring and are good for short hairstyles but are time-consuming and can be costly.
13 citations
,
March 2013 in “Dermatologic Surgery” The document concludes that hair restoration has advanced significantly, with FUE becoming more popular, and stresses the importance of physician training and ethical practices in the field.
41 citations
,
August 2013 in “Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America” FUE provides minimal scarring and quick recovery in hair transplantation, and surgeons not using it may lag in technology.
January 2014 in “Journal of the turkish academy of dermatology” Hair transplantation is safe and effective for permanent hair loss due to scarring, with high patient satisfaction.
4 citations
,
January 2019 in “Archives of clinical and medical case reports” Combining FUE hair transplantation with PRP improves hair density and patient satisfaction in scarring alopecia.