Dermatology, Second Edition

    David R. Arrowsmith
    Image of study
    TLDR The book "Dermatology" has useful content but some sections lack detail and accuracy; it's recommended for dermatologists to review before buying.
    The document is a book review of the second edition of "Dermatology," edited by Samuel L. Moschella and Harry J. Hurley. The reviewer, Robert G. Crounse, M.D., expresses frustration with the book's "Clinical Trichology" section, noting a lack of rigorous biochemistry, insufficient data, and inadequate referencing, particularly in the discussion of hair loss following heparin and hypothyroidism-related alopecia. Despite these criticisms, Crounse acknowledges the book's value in describing older European syndromes and congenital syndromes, and he appreciates the inclusion of material up to 1979. He suggests that dermatologists should consult the book before purchasing to decide its usefulness for themselves. The review also mentions a second review by David R. Arrowsmith, M.D., who praises the book as a comprehensive dermatologic textbook with minor criticisms, such as the use of outdated terms and minor proofreading errors. Arrowsmith highlights the book's value as a teaching tool and reference source for practitioners. The document also briefly mentions a review of "Regional Dermatology: A System of Diagnosis" by Ervin Epstein, M.D., which is praised as a useful pocket reference for on-the-spot diagnosis.
    Discuss this study in the Community →