Search
for

    Sort by

    Community Join

    30 / 1000+ results

      community PELAGE PHASE 2 TRIALS FOR PP405 - Volunteers Needed

       24 upvotes 2 years ago
      PP405 is a topical gel being tested for hair regrowth in adults with androgenetic alopecia. Volunteers aged 18-55 are needed for a 16-week trial in several US locations.

      community Blood tests in MPB with low test and low SHGB

       1 upvotes 2 years ago
      A 31-year-old male plans to start oral finasteride and minoxidil for hair regrowth after a hair transplant and is considering testosterone replacement therapy due to low testosterone levels. He has a history of using topical minoxidil and spironolactone, with side effects, and is preparing for a comprehensive blood test to address hair loss and overall well-being.

      community How long are Pelage going to milk the phase 2a results of PP405?

       21 upvotes 7 months ago
      PP405, a potential hair loss treatment, is facing delays in releasing Phase 2 results, causing frustration among users who compare it to past failed treatments. Despite skepticism, some remain hopeful about PP405's future, while others discuss alternative treatments like Clascoterone and its expected market release.

      community PP405 (Non) Update - Feb 2025

       36 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses the delay in the PP405 Phase 2 study results, now expected by the end of 2025, and skepticism about research practices. There is also mention of optimism for Amplifica's AMP303 and a topical treatment in early testing.

      community Pp405 phase 2a clinical results

       37 upvotes 1 year ago
      PP405 shows initial promise for treating androgenetic alopecia, with safety confirmed in early trials, but skepticism remains due to limited data. Further trials are needed to determine its true efficacy and potential market impact.

      community If PP405 doesn't work then why would Pelage continue with trials?

       44 upvotes 1 month ago
      PP405 is still undergoing trials despite skepticism about its effectiveness. Some believe it shows potential for hair regrowth, possibly in combination with other treatments like minoxidil or finasteride, while others are doubtful due to past disappointments with similar products.

      community A warning to anyone considering 3rd party sourcing PP405 or its analogs

       30 upvotes 5 months ago
      Be cautious when sourcing PP405 or its analogs from third-party suppliers due to potential safety risks and lack of regulatory approval. The conversation highlights concerns about counterfeit products and the absence of reliable testing, making it risky to use such treatments.

      community Found a slide summary for PP405

       35 upvotes 5 months ago
      PP405 shows promise in stimulating new terminal hair growth by activating dormant follicles, with no systemic adverse effects observed in a short-term trial. However, long-term efficacy remains unproven, and further trials are needed to confirm its potential as a hair loss treatment.

      community Pp405 trials question - 2a/2b,

       6 upvotes 10 months ago
      PP405 trials have completed phase 2a, showing promising results with a 31% stat for hair density increase, and are moving directly to phase 3. Detailed results will be presented at a medical conference in 2026.

      community PHG Invites

       4 upvotes 10 years ago
      The conversation discusses a community called PHG, which focuses on experimental hair loss treatments and scientific approaches to hair regrowth. It mentions treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and RU58841, and highlights interest in new treatments like Setipripant, Histogen, and Replicel.

      community Is this real? Pp405-3hp @ everychem

       4 upvotes 5 months ago
      The conversation discusses the availability and legitimacy of a hair loss treatment called PP405-3HP. Users express skepticism about its release and reference patent information.

      community Setipiprant trial results

       10 upvotes 7 years ago
      Setipiprant trial for hair loss failed, showing no difference between placebo and treatment. Discussion also noted placebo users reporting side effects.

      community Will pp405 have to be inserted rectally for full benefits?

       33 upvotes 9 months ago
      Pp405 is discussed as a potential hair loss treatment, with humorous suggestions about rectal administration for increased effectiveness. Users joke about unconventional methods and express willingness to try anything for hair regrowth.

      community Is trichogram a good thing for testing genetic hair loss

       2 upvotes 6 months ago
      A dermatologist checked for hereditary hair loss using blood tests and plans to perform a trichogram. The user had slightly low Vitamin D3 levels, and the trichogram may help confirm androgenetic alopecia.

      community Pp405 trial question: will they test higher doses?

       1 upvotes 10 months ago
      The conversation discusses whether future trials for a hair loss treatment will test higher doses to improve effectiveness. It questions if current lower doses are for safety and if more effective doses will be tested later.

      community PYRILUTAMIDE PHASE 3 RESULTS : No statistical significance

       124 upvotes 2 years ago
      The phase 3 trial results for Pyrilutamide showed no significant difference from the control treatment in increasing hair count, leading to the company halting its development. Users discussed their disappointment and skepticism about hair loss treatments, with some mentioning other treatments like Minoxidil, Finasteride, and RU58841.

      community Verteporfin Update with Dr Blake Bloxham

       28 upvotes 2 years ago
      The conversation discusses Dr. Blake Bloxham's experiment with Verteporfin for hair loss, with one person suggesting more doctors should try it as it seems beneficial. Another comment notes that results at 4-5 months were not very impressive.

      community PP405 2a study was a safety study. Some rational explaining.

       22 upvotes 1 year ago
      The conversation discusses the safety study of PP405, emphasizing that early trials focus on safety rather than efficacy, and that any efficacy data from such a short study should be viewed skeptically. It also highlights that the information released is primarily for securing funding, and that meaningful efficacy results are expected in later phases.