Search

everythingexperts & clinicslearnfaqsresearchcommunity

for

Search:↓

Procapil is marketed as a natural hair loss treatment but lacks strong evidence and is industry-biased. Minoxidil and Finasteride are the only FDA-approved treatments for androgenetic alopecia.

The user is using oral minoxidil, ghk-cu, and HGH for hair regrowth, noticing small vellus hairs on the crown. They avoid traditional DHT blockers like finasteride due to side effects, despite skepticism from others about the effectiveness of ghk-cu.

Adenosine is discussed as a potential treatment for hair loss, with mentions of its presence in certain shampoos and Minoxidilmax products. Users express interest in topical adenosine but are cautious about sourcing it from places like Amazon or Alibaba.

The user has been dealing with hair loss for six years using minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride without success. They are contemplating shaving their head due to continued hair loss and social anxiety.

Amplifica is testing a compound called AMP-303 for hair loss, but it's not Scube3 or osteopontin. The timing for the results from the clinical trial is unknown.

Creatine may increase DHT, but many users report no significant hair loss when using it alongside treatments like finasteride, dutasteride, and minoxidil. Some individuals experience hair shedding with creatine, but scientific evidence does not consistently support a link between creatine and increased hair loss.

A 31-year-old experienced hair regrowth using a daily regimen of 5% minoxidil spray and 1mg oral finasteride over six months, with no side effects. The user noticed slow but positive progress, especially in the temple area, and plans to continue the treatment as advised by their doctor.

The user has been using a treatment regimen for hair loss for 8 months, including topical 5% minoxidil, 2.5 mg daily minoxidil, 5 mg finasteride every other day, and vitamins. They shared progress pictures showing little change in the crown area.

VDPHL01 is discussed as a potential replacement for DHT blockers, with comparisons to minoxidil. Users express skepticism about its effectiveness without addressing DHT, suggesting it may only slow hair loss rather than stop it.

The conversation is about frustration over the delay in phase 2 results for a hair loss treatment called GT20029. One user suspects the treatment may have failed.

The conversation is about the anticipated release date of phase II results for a hair loss treatment called GT20029 and the cautious optimism surrounding it due to past disappointments with similar treatments. Users expect an update in the next few months.

The user experienced significant hair regrowth and improved hair quality after six months of using oral minoxidil, finasteride, and micro-needling. They reported increased libido initially but no other side effects, and they plan to continue the treatment.

A new sugar gel for hair regrowth shows promise, but its effectiveness and safety are uncertain, especially since it was tested on mice and may have risks like tumor development. Ingredients for the gel include sodium alginate, propylene glycol, 2-phenoxyethanol, and 2-deoxy-D-ribose sugar.

A 47-year-old male experienced significant hair regrowth over six months using 1mg oral finasteride, 5mg oral minoxidil, and 1ml 5% topical minoxidil, along with weekly derm stamping. He reported no major side effects, improved prostate health, and increased vascularity, with hair texture changes and minor nasal congestion.

PP405 and hair cloning are discussed as potential treatments for reversing hair loss from Norwood 7 to Norwood 1. Hair cloning is seen as a more permanent solution, while PP405's effectiveness and long-term effects remain uncertain.

The conversation discusses the potential for developing a biologic "DHT sponge" to neutralize DHT in the bloodstream as a treatment for hair loss, suggesting it could be more targeted and have fewer side effects than current treatments like finasteride and dutasteride. Concerns include the complexity, cost, and potential side effects of such a treatment, as well as skepticism about its feasibility and market interest.

Hair loss treatments like Minoxidil, finasteride, and potential mRNA therapies are discussed. There is skepticism about targeting specific genes due to the complex genetic nature of hair loss.

Male-pattern baldness might increase UVB exposure on the scalp, potentially affecting vitamin D and skeletal health. The hypothesis is debated, with some seeing it as a minor benefit in specific contexts.

Hair loss is linked to cellular physiology and the IGF-1 to TGF-B1 ratio, not just androgen sensitivity. The theory lacks evidence, while finasteride and minoxidil are effective treatments.

The user had a hair transplant in May 2020 with 2000 grafts and has been using minoxidil and finasteride for maintenance. They are considering a second hair transplant for the crown area but are currently holding off.

Concerns about the potential high cost of new hair loss treatments, pp405 and gt20029, were discussed, with some users willing to pay a premium if they are effective. Alternatives like finasteride and minoxidil are mentioned as current, more affordable options, and there is speculation about future generic versions and black market availability.

PP405 is a potential hair loss treatment undergoing trials, with discussions on its effectiveness and comparison to existing treatments like finasteride and minoxidil. There is skepticism about its status as a cure, with hopes for future advancements in genetic treatments like CRISPR.

The user has been using oral finasteride for over a year and recently added GHK-CU for two months, seeing progress but seeking further improvement, especially on the hairline. They discuss sourcing GHK-CU, its effects, and the importance of third-party testing, while considering additional treatments like dutasteride and hair transplants for better results.

David Barreto shared that a London-based research group is conducting a 12-month trial for a new nutraceutical treatment for pattern hair loss, designed with Dr. Carlos Puig. The trial aims to provide robust data, with results expected in 1-2 years, potentially representing a significant advancement since finasteride’s introduction in 1997.

The conversation is about hair loss treatments, specifically discussing GHK-Cu, with some users suggesting Minoxidil as more effective. OP is looking for a GHK-Cu product available in Europe.

Bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost can aid hair regrowth but are costly and less effective than minoxidil. They work best when combined with minoxidil and finasteride.

Deoxy-D-ribose sugar gel may work similarly to Minoxidil for hair growth, but stopping use could lead to loss of gains. Users discuss its effectiveness and caution about product ingredients, with some planning to make their own serum.

A 30-year-old with Norwood 3V hair loss uses finasteride 1.25 mg every other day and Minoxidil (Regaine 5%) twice daily, experiencing no side effects with the current regimen. The front hairline remains unchanged, but the crown appears better in certain lighting.

A 20-year-old shared their 6-month hair loss progress using 1mg finasteride three times a week, 5% minoxidil twice daily, and 1mm dermarolling once a week. Users noted significant improvements and inquired about shedding.

Creatine may cause hair loss in some individuals, though there is no scientific consensus. Personal experiences vary, with some reporting increased shedding and others seeing no effect.