TLDR Teledermatology is highly effective for diagnosing and managing hair loss.
The systematic review on teledermatology in alopecia, involving 11 studies and 9622 patients, found that teledermatology, particularly with teletrichoscopy, is highly effective for diagnosing and managing hair loss, achieving a 100% diagnostic accuracy. About 52% of patients monitored via telemedicine showed hair growth or improvement. Despite high patient satisfaction and its potential to facilitate treatment, teledermatology visits for alopecia are less frequent compared to other dermatologic conditions. Further research is needed to develop guidelines and maximize teledermatology's potential in alopecia care.
October 2022 in “International Journal of Dermatology” Digital health platforms improve treatment for male pattern hair loss.
January 2022 in “Indian Dermatology Online Journal” Teledermatology effectively managed most skin conditions remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
3 citations,
August 2021 in “Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology” Teledermatology was popular among young adults and women, and high-resolution photos improved service during the pandemic.
6 citations,
October 2020 in “Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology” Teletrichoscopy is a promising method for diagnosing hair disorders remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.
40 citations,
August 2021 in “JAAD international” Teledermatology became a valuable and convenient tool for skin care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
51 citations,
April 2021 in “JAMA network open” The AI tool helped primary care doctors and nurse practitioners diagnose skin conditions more accurately.
28 citations,
February 2014 in “Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare” Smartphone-based teledermatology is effective for diagnosing skin diseases in the military with good accuracy.
20 citations,
August 2019 in “Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare” Dermatologists found teledermatology useful and confidence-boosting for diagnosing skin conditions, but faced limitations like technical issues and prescription restrictions. Despite this, they saw its potential to improve access to skin care, especially in remote areas.
