Review of: "“Toupee or not Toupee?” Sic (et Non). Social perceptions of Male Pattern Baldness (Androgenetic Alopecia)"

The review of the paper "Toupee or not Toupee?" highlights several areas for improvement. The reviewer suggests that the study needs to provide more information about the sample size used to ensure statistical significance and representativeness. The generalizability of the findings beyond the specific sample used in the research should also be considered. The methodology section needs more detail for a comprehensive understanding of how judgments were collected and analyzed. The study should address potential biases, including cultural or personal preferences of judges. Lastly, the paper should discuss any ethical considerations related to using individuals as stimuli for attractiveness judgments and other traits.