Roop Singh, Rajesh Rohilla, Raj Kumar Dhayal, Rajeev Sen, P. K. Sehgal
We don't know much about this study yet.
We're maintaining the world's largest resposity of hair loss
research. You can help out the community by
sending a PDF of this study here
.
Not sure how to get a study's PDF? You can email the authors
of the study.
A 27-year-old male experiencing hair loss post-Covid is considering PRP (platelet-richplasma) therapy. He's seeking personal experiences about the process, particularly regarding pain levels, despite his dermatologist's assurance of using local anesthesia.
Someone's brother tried Platelet-richplasma (PRP) for hair loss; it had minimal effect on hair but improved skin appearance. Microneedling at home was suggested as a more sustainable alternative.
Platelet-richplasma (PRP) therapy for hair loss is expensive, painful, and often ineffective, with mixed reviews on its benefits. Alternatives like minoxidil, finasteride, and hair transplants are suggested as more reliable options.
PRP treatment for hair loss shows some evidence of effectiveness, with HT surgeons using it post-op to promote growth. Microneedling is mentioned as a cheaper alternative.
PRP treatments have been effective for the user, with a new recommendation of using a high-quality plasma kit once a year. The user seeks experiences with this specific PRP approach.
24 citations
,
November 2017 in “Aesthetic Plastic Surgery”
All types of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) can treat hair loss, but homologous PRP works best due to its higher platelet count and growth factors from multiple donors.