Outperforming Ourselves: Invitation for Dialogue
August 2002
in “
Sexualities
”
Studysummary This article reviews and critiques Tamsin Wilton's arguments on MTF transsexualism, suggesting her work reaffirms Cartesian dualism rather than dismantling it, and emphasizes the need for continued dialogue in transsex, lesbian, and feminist communities.
Our plain-language summary. Not medical advice or a treatment recommendation. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing treatment. Full disclaimer
In the 2002 critique by Myra J. Hird, the arguments of Tamsin Wilton on male-to-female (MTF) transsexualism are analyzed and found to inadvertently reinforce the psycho-medical discourses they intend to challenge. Hird argues that Wilton's reliance on Cartesian dualism and focus on sex reassignment surgery (SRS) as 'medicalized discourses' overlooks the diversity of trans experiences and excludes non-binary narratives. The critique extends to Wilton's use of male pronouns for trans women and the omission of FTM accounts. Hird advocates for a more nuanced understanding of gender and corporeality, challenging essentialist views and promoting dialogue within transsex, lesbian, and feminist communities. The document also addresses the heteronormative bias in psychoanalytic and psychiatric reports, the problematic nature of defining womanhood biologically, and the importance of inclusive gender narratives that recognize the performative aspects of sex and gender. Hird calls for unity among feminist, lesbian, queer, and trans communities to address broader social issues.
