TLDR Half of hair restoration surgeons experience body discomfort, especially after follicular unit extraction procedures, and using ergonomic equipment or robotic devices could reduce this discomfort.
In 2016, a survey of 38 hair restoration surgeons revealed that 50% experienced musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) such as pain, fatigue, and discomfort during or after procedures, particularly follicular unit extraction (FUE). These symptoms were more prevalent and lasted longer (7-24 hours postoperatively) in those performing FUE procedures compared to single strip excision procedures. Despite the importance of ergonomics, only 30% used ergonomic support during FUE procedures. The study suggested the use of ergonomic equipment and a robotic FUE device to reduce musculoskeletal stress.
13 citations,
March 2013 in “Dermatologic Surgery” The document concludes that hair restoration has advanced significantly, with FUE becoming more popular, and stresses the importance of physician training and ethical practices in the field.
4 citations,
January 2005 in “Elsevier eBooks” Follicular Unit Transplantation is a precise hair restoration technique that requires careful planning and a skilled team, and Follicular Unit Extraction offers a less invasive option.
1 citations,
May 2021 in “International Journal of Dermatology” Long hair follicular unit excision is effective for hair transplants, providing quick, natural-looking results with less pain but needs more time, staff, and skill.
August 2014 in “Plastic Surgery” Dr. WP Unger suggested that traditional strip harvesting might be better for hair transplants than Follicular Unit Extraction due to higher hair survival rates and less risk of a patchy look at the donor site.
January 2014 in “Plastic Surgery” Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) for hair transplants has limitations and may not be suitable for most patients.
11 citations,
October 2020 in “Sensors” Photoacoustic imaging can accurately assess hair follicle density and orientation for hair transplant planning.
